In this year, Chile celebrates 200 years old of independent life. These began in 1810, when the patriots made the first national junta in opposition to the Spanish Kingdom. Then came the independent’s war, between realist and patriots during 8 years. Today, in 2010, Chile celebrates his bicentenary. For some of the Chileans is a big party to the nation, for others is nothing to celebrate. I think this bicentenary has two senses in this sociocultural context, I mean, that it is a positive and a negative sense.
In first place, the negative sense referred to the ideological function of this celebration to the civil society. I mean that the bicentenary is an excuse to the politics for being legitimized for the citizens or “the people”. The unit, the nation, O’higgins, Carrera … are the words that permitted to create the myth of the bicentenary. This myth hides social problems, for example, inequalities in Education, in work, in the distribution of social product and the social power.
In second place, the positive sense referred to the 200 years of the Chilean people’s history. I mean, more than the history of the heroes, presidents, army, and important events, is the history of the normal people; workers, mothers, students, aborigines, and the poor people. They are the ones who really build this country, and not the other big figures.
The traditional historians have legitimized the first perspective about the nation’s history. They highlight heroic figures like O’Higgins, Carrera, Portales, Ibañez del Campo, etc. For the other side, there are a few historians that make people’s history; his perspective is more focus in the social processes. These last historians belong to the Marxist tradition and the cultural studies, for example Gabriel Salazar.
From my perspective, the real history is the one of social processes. I mean I believe that the history is made for the people and not from particular persons. This last perspective is more ideological than realistic, therefore is functional to the reproduction of the order of the society and the status quo, privileging the powerful figures of all times.